<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ChatGPT &#8211; ComplianceAcuity</title>
	<atom:link href="https://complianceacuity.com/category/chatgpt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://complianceacuity.com</link>
	<description>Medical Device Regulatory Consultants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 20:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>ChatGPT for Regulatory Documentation</title>
		<link>https://complianceacuity.com/chatgpt-for-regulatory-documentation/</link>
					<comments>https://complianceacuity.com/chatgpt-for-regulatory-documentation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Randall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ChatGPT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://complianceacuity.com/?p=16950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[March 30, 2023 ChatGPT for Regulatory Documentation &#160; ChatGPT can only be as good as the source information which is publicly available in the electronic information ecosystem.  There&#8217;s a lot of polluted information in that ecosystem, and it hasn&#8217;t necessarily been properly vetted for integrity.  I did an informal mock audit of some ChatGPT-generated regulatory [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 30, 2023</p>
<h1>ChatGPT for Regulatory Documentation</h1>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>ChatGPT can only be as good as the source information which is publicly available in the electronic information ecosystem.  There&#8217;s a lot of polluted information in that ecosystem, and it hasn&#8217;t necessarily been properly vetted for integrity.  I did an informal mock audit of some ChatGPT-generated regulatory documents a few weeks back and I was able to find regulatory nonconformities.  ChatGPT might be a way to avoid starting with a blank slate. But it ultimately can&#8217;t compete with experienced, knowledgeable, sensitive, discerning people.</h3>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://complianceacuity.com/chatgpt-for-regulatory-documentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
